Human Trafficking Lawyer Ottawa

Frouhar Law defends clients charged with human trafficking and trafficking in persons in Ottawa and Eastern Ontario. These charges, which cover any person who exercises control, direction, or influence over another person for the purpose of exploitation, are among the most serious in the Criminal Code of Canada.

Human trafficking charges carry mandatory minimum sentences, mandatory criminal records, and maximum penalties extending to life imprisonment. Our criminal defence services in Ottawa include representation at every level of court in Ontario. Contact us for a free consultation.

Contact a Human Trafficking Lawyer Near Me

Name(Required)
Human Trafficking Lawyer Ottawa | Frouhar Law

Facing a Human Trafficking Charge in Ottawa?


Human trafficking charges are prosecuted aggressively in Ontario and carry some of the most serious consequences in Canadian criminal law. They can affect your freedom, reputation, employment, family relationships, immigration status, and future before a trial ever takes place. The right defence counsel understands the legal complexity, sensitivity, and urgency these cases demand.

Why Choose Frouhar Law for Human Trafficking Defence?


Learn More

Frouhar Law defends clients facing human trafficking charges in Ottawa and across Eastern Ontario. These cases are often complex, urgent, and highly sensitive, with allegations that may involve exploitation, control, financial benefit, witness statements, digital evidence, bail restrictions, and serious reputational consequences before a trial ever takes place.

If you have been arrested, charged, or contacted by police, early legal advice from a human trafficking lawyer can help protect your rights and guide your next steps.

Defence Led by a Former Crown Attorney

Founding partner Mash Frouhar is a former Crown Attorney who understands how prosecutors approach human trafficking cases, including complainant statements, electronic communications, financial records, surveillance evidence, credibility issues, exploitation allegations, and the Crown's theory of control or coercion. She also sits on a specialized Legal Aid Ontario panel. Membership requires substantial trial experience, and few lawyers are accepted to represent legal aid clients facing the most serious charges, including homicide and murder.

Bilingual Legal Representation in English and French

Frouhar Law provides human trafficking defence in both English and French. From the first consultation to disclosure review, bail hearings, Crown negotiations, and trial preparation, clients receive clear explanations in the language they are most comfortable using.

Available 24 Hours, Including the Night of Your Arrest

Human trafficking arrests can happen suddenly, often after a police investigation, complainant statement, search warrant, or related allegation involving exploitation or organized activity. Frouhar Law's 24-hour availability means you can contact a defence lawyer before answering police questions or making a statement. Your right to counsel is protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Call before you speak.

Talk to a Human Trafficking Lawyer

The first steps after a human trafficking arrest can affect your bail conditions, contact restrictions, disclosure review, admissibility of evidence, and the direction of your entire defence.

Book a Consultation

Learn All About Our Team

Meet Our Ottawa Human Trafficking Defence Team

Mash Frouhar

Barrister & Solicitor, former Crown Attorney, bilingual (EN/FR/Farsi)

Connie D'Angelo

Barrister & Solicitor, sexual offence proceedings

Human Trafficking Charges in Canada


Human trafficking in persons is a federal criminal offence under the Criminal Code of Canada. The charging provisions run from section 279.01 to section 279.04. These charges are prosecuted vigorously by Crown attorneys as a matter of policy in Ontario, so early and experienced legal representation is critical.

Section 279.01(1) of the Criminal Code makes it an indictable offence for any person who recruits, transports, transfers, receives, holds, conceals, or harbours a person (or who exercises control, direction, or influence over the movements of a person) for the purpose of exploiting them or facilitating their exploitation.

The penalties under section 279.01 depend on what occurred during the commission of the offence:

  • Life imprisonment and mandatory minimum 5 years: where the accused kidnapped the victim, committed an aggravated assault, committed an aggravated sexual assault, or caused death during the offence
  • Maximum 14 years and mandatory minimum 4 years: in all other cases

A section 279.01 conviction results in a permanent criminal record. A discharge is not available. The mandatory minimums mean that even first-time offenders face a minimum of 4 years imprisonment upon conviction.

Section 279.011 applies the same conduct as s.279.01 but to victims under the age of 18. The mandatory minimum sentences are higher:

  • Life imprisonment and mandatory minimum 6 years where kidnapping, aggravated assault, aggravated sexual assault, or death occurred
  • Maximum 14 years and mandatory minimum 5 years in all other cases

A section 279.011 charge frequently arises in the context of domestic sex trafficking; a young person in a relationship with an accused who allegedly controlled their movements for sexual exploitation purposes.

Material Benefit

Section 279.02 makes it an indictable offence to receive a financial or other material benefit knowing it was obtained by or derived from trafficking in persons. This provision captures individuals who profit from another person's trafficking without directly participating in the recruitment, transport, or control of the victim.

The maximum penalty is 10 years; there is no mandatory minimum, and it can be prosecuted by summary conviction.

Withholding Identity

Section 279.03 makes it an offence to withhold, destroy, conceal, remove, or seize a person's identity documents for the purpose of committing or facilitating trafficking in persons. Withholding identity documents (confiscating a victim's passport or identification to prevent them from leaving) is specifically targeted by this provision.

The maximum penalty is 5 years.

Co-Accused Situations

Co-accused situations are common in trafficking prosecutions: multiple individuals may be charged at once based on their roles in a trafficking network. A driver, recruiter, and accommodation provider may each face different charges from the same investigation.

Contact a Human Trafficking Lawyer in Ottawa Today

Frouhar Law defends trafficking in persons charges in Ottawa and Eastern Ontario. Call 613.238.2000 before speaking to police.

Book a Free Consultation

What Is Exploitation? The Section 279.04 Definition


The concept of exploitation is central to every human trafficking charge. Without proof of exploitation (or the purpose of exploiting), there is no trafficking in persons conviction. The statutory definition under section 279.04 is specific and distinct from the general meaning of the word.

The Legal Test for Exploitation

Section 279.04 defines exploitation as conduct that causes a person to provide labour or a service by engaging in conduct that, in all the circumstances, could reasonably be expected to cause the other person to believe that their safety or the safety of a person known to them would be threatened if they failed to provide the labour or service.

The test is objective; not whether the victim actually feared for their safety, but whether a reasonable person in the victim's circumstances would have. Courts may consider the victim's age, gender, nationality, and relationship with the accused.

This is a broad provision. Threats to safety can be explicit (direct threats of violence) or implicit (conduct that creates a climate of fear and dependence). The accused's purpose (the intention behind their conduct) is the key element that distinguishes trafficking from other offences.

The exploitation definition covers both sex trafficking (providing sexual services under threat) and labour trafficking (providing forced labour under threat). The same statutory definition applies to both contexts.

Consent Is Not a Defence

Section 279.01(2) of the Criminal Code is explicit: no consent to the activity that forms the subject matter of a trafficking charge is valid. Consent is not a defence to human trafficking charges.

A complainant may tell police they agreed to the arrangement, believed they were operating voluntarily, or were in a relationship with the accused. None of this eliminates the trafficking charge if the Crown can prove the accused's conduct met the exploitation definition. Apparent consent is legally irrelevant to the trafficking charge.

Related Charges in Human Trafficking Cases

Human trafficking charges in Ottawa rarely appear alone. A person charged with trafficking in persons will typically face a matrix of additional charges arising from the same investigation.

Sexual Services Charges (Sections 286.1286.4)

In sex trafficking cases, Crown attorneys typically lay charges under the sexual services provisions alongside the trafficking charge:

  • Section 286.2: material benefit from sexual services; indictable, maximum 10 years
  • Section 286.3: procuring; indictable, maximum 14 years
  • Section 286.4: advertising sexual services of another; hybrid, maximum 5 years

These charges cover the full spectrum of sexual offences in Ottawa that may arise from a trafficking investigation. A client facing a s.279.01 charge should expect procuring and material benefit charges at minimum.

Human Trafficking Under the IRPA

The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) contains its own human trafficking offences at section 118: making it an offence to knowingly organize, induce, aid, or abet the coming into or attempting to come into Canada of one or more persons by the use of abduction, fraud, deception, or coercion. IRPA trafficking offences carry a maximum of life imprisonment and fines of up to $1 million.

IRPA trafficking charges arise where the victim is a foreign national who was brought to Canada or kept in Canada under exploitative circumstances. Where a trafficking investigation involves drug charges in Ottawa arising from the same criminal organization, the charge matrix becomes significantly more complex.

Kidnapping, Forcible Confinement, and Aggravated Assault

Where the accused is alleged to have physically restrained the victim or used violence, additional Criminal Code charges typically follow.

The presence of kidnapping, aggravated assault, or aggravated sexual assault during the commission of a trafficking offence increases the mandatory minimum under s.279.01 from 4 to 5 years and triggers life imprisonment as the maximum.

Speak with Frouhar Law: Ottawa Human Trafficking Defence

Human trafficking cases require immediate legal representation. Contact Frouhar Law at 613.238.2000. Available for urgent consultations.

Contact Us Today

Defending Human Trafficking Charges in Ottawa


Human trafficking investigations in Canada are typically lengthy and involve extensive electronic surveillance: wiretap authorizations under Part VI of the Criminal Code, undercover operations, and coordinated police searches across multiple locations. The evidence gathered in these investigations is almost always the product of search warrants, production orders, and wire authorizations.

Charter motions and applications are the primary defence tool in trafficking cases. Where a wiretap authorization was granted without sufficient grounds, where a search warrant was executed improperly, or where the accused's right to counsel was violated upon arrest, the evidence gathered can be excluded.

In a trafficking case built on electronic surveillance, evidence exclusion can be case-dispositive.

Not every person charged with human trafficking is guilty. False allegations arise in domestic situations, in co-accused matters where one person points to another, and in cases where the relationship between the accused and the complainant is complex and was mischaracterized to police.

The Crown must prove every element of the trafficking offence beyond a reasonable doubt, including the accused's specific purpose and knowledge. Where the accused did not know the complainant was being exploited, or where their conduct did not in fact amount to control, direction, or influence over the complainant's movements, the trafficking charge may not be made out.

Human trafficking charges frequently result in detention at the bail hearing. The Crown often argues that release poses a danger to public safety or a risk of reoffending, and the accused may face a reverse onus where the burden falls on them to show why detention is not justified.

Understanding how bail works in Canada is essential for any accused person and their family at this stage.

Contact a Human Trafficking Lawyer

The earlier you retain defence counsel, the more options remain open.
Tel: 613.238.2000

Schedule a Consultation
What People Say About Us

Client Testimonials

three steps to success

We Will Help You Every Step Of The Way

The mission is to ensure access to justice for all, regardless of income or social status, by providing high-quality, affordable legal representation and advice. The goal is to empower people to protect their rights and resolve legal issues efficiently and effectively.

01

learning about all your legal issues

02

Pair you up with the Perfect Attorney

03

Fight For You in Court

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the mandatory minimum sentence for human trafficking in Canada?

Under section 279.01 of the Criminal Code, the mandatory minimum sentence for trafficking in persons is 4 years in most cases, increasing to 5 years where the accused kidnapped the victim, committed an aggravated assault or aggravated sexual assault, or caused the victim’s death during the offence.

Where the victim is under 18 (section 279.011), the mandatory minimums are 5 years (general) and 6 years (with kidnapping, assault, or death). The maximum penalty is 14 years or life imprisonment depending on the circumstances. 

A discharge is not available. Every person convicted of human trafficking receives a permanent criminal record.

Can I be convicted of human trafficking if the other person consented?

Yes. Section 279.01(2) of the Criminal Code provides explicitly that no consent to the activity forming the subject matter of a trafficking charge is valid. Consent is not a defence to human trafficking charges.

The Crown does not need to prove the victim did not consent. What the Crown must prove is that the accused’s conduct met the exploitation definition under s.279.04 and that the accused’s purpose was to exploit the complainant or facilitate their exploitation.

What other charges are typically laid alongside human trafficking?

  • In sex trafficking cases, Crown attorneys typically lay procuring (s.286.3) and material benefit from sexual services (s.286.2) charges alongside the s.279.01 trafficking charge. 
  • Advertising sexual services (s.286.4), kidnapping, forcible confinement, and assault charges may also be added depending on the facts. 
  • Where the victim is a foreign national, IRPA trafficking charges may be laid in addition to the Criminal Code charges. 
  • In organized crime cases, additional charges under the Criminal Code criminal organization provisions may apply.

Schedule A Consultation